Blog

  • Schwerer Gustav & Dora Railway Guns

    Schwerer Gustav & Dora Railway Guns

    Schwerer Gustav Firing Test

    Krupp 80cm Kanone

    In the 1930s, France constructed the Maginot Line, which was a series of fortifications and obstacles intended to protect the country against invasion from the east (Germany). The Maginot Line was to serve as an impenetrable wall of defense. Naturally, when one country develops a new defensive technology, other countries rush to develop a way to defeat that technology.

    Schwerer Gustav (Dora) Demonstration March 19 1943 Rügenwalde Germany Adolf Hitler And Albert Speer
    The Krupp 80 cm Kanone (E) Schwerer Gustav (identical to the sister gun, Dora) being readied for a test firing on March 19, 1943, at Rügenwalde, Germany. Albert Speer (right), Adolf Hitler (second from right), and a number of other officials observed the demonstration. Hitler referred to the massive railway gun as “meine stählerne faust (my steel fist).” Such firepower bolstered moral of fighting troops, creating a belief of invincibility, conversely creating psychological panic on the receiving side.

    The Krupp 80 cm Kanone (E) Schwerer Gustav / Dora being readied for a test firing on 19 March 1943 at Rügenwalde, Germany. Albert Speer (right), Adolf Hitler (second from right), and a number of other officials observed the firing. Hitler referred to the impractical gun as “meine stählerne faust (my steel fist).”
    After studying details of Maginot Line fortifications that were published in French newspapers, it became apparent to German Wehrmacht (combined armed forces) planners that they did not possess any weapon capable of penetrating the fortifications. In 1935, the Wehrmacht requested Friedrich Krupp AG (Krupp), a heavy industry conglomerate in Essen, Germany, to prepare ballistics reports for guns firing 27.6, 31.5, 33.5, and 39.4 in (70, 80, 85, and 100 cm) shells. The goal was to fire the gun outside of the enemy’s artillery range and be able to penetrate 23 ft (7 m) of reinforced concrete or 3 ft (1 m) of steel armor. The Krupp factory dutifully ran the calculations and supplied the requested information but took no further action.

    In March 1936, Adolf Hitler visited the Krupp factory and asked Gustav Krupp (von Bohlen und Halbach), head of the Krupp organization, what type of weapon was needed to smash through the Maginot Line. Krupp, recalling the recent report, was able to answer Hitler’s question in some detail. Krupp explained that a 33.5 in (80 cm) railway gun could be constructed and would be able to defeat the Maginot Line. After Hitler’s visit, Krupp directed his design staff to begin the layout of such a weapon. Erich Müller was the head of the artillery development department at Krupp and began working on the gun’s design.

    Nicknamed Dora by its crew, the massive gun was broken down into 25 pieces and transported by rail to its firing location. Two gantry cranes were used to reassemble the gun. Here, the cradle is being positioned into the carrier. Note the three normal railroad tracks and the special track for the cranes.
    In early 1937, Krupp met with Hitler and presented him with the design for the 33.5 in (80 cm) railway gun. Hitler approved of what he saw, and the German Army High Command (Oberkommando des Heeres) commissioned Krupp to build three guns under the designation 80 cm Kanone (E). However, the guns quickly became known as Schwerer Gustav (Heavy Gustav), named after Gustav Krupp. Hitler wanted the first gun to be ready by March 1940.

    The Schwerer Gustav was an absolutely huge weapon. The rifled barrel consisted of two halves, with the rear half covered by a jacket. The complete barrel was 106 ft 7 in (32.48 m) long, and its rifling was .39 in (10 mm) deep. Attached to the rear of the barrel was the cradle and breechblock. Mounted to the cradle were four hydraulic recoil absorbers. Trunnions held the gun’s cradle in two huge carriers and enabled the barrel to be elevated from 0 to 65 degrees. Each carrier was supported by four railroad trucks: two in the front and two in the rear. Each of the eight trucks was made up of five axles, giving the Schwerer Gustav a total of 80 wheels that were carried on two parallel sets of railroad tracks. The gun used a diesel-powered generator to provide power to run its systems. The Schwerer Gustav was 155 ft 2 in (47.30 m) long, 23 ft 4 in (7.10 m) wide, and 38 ft 1 in (11.60 m) tall. The barrel, cradle, and breech weighed 881,848 lb (400,000 kg), and the complete gun weighed 2,976,237 lb (1,350,000 kg).

    This image gives a good view of the tracks needed to assemble the Schwerer Gustav. One pair of D 311 locomotives is positioned in front of the gun.
    In addition to needing parallel tracks, the Schwerer Gustav required its track to be curved up to 15 degrees. The gun had no built-in ability to traverse, so horizontal aiming (azimuth) was accomplished by moving the entire gun along the curved track. Extra bracing was added to the inside rail of both tracks along the shooting curve. This bracing helped prevent the tracks from being damaged due to the gun’s recoil. A massive effort was needed to transport and set up the Schwerer Gustav for firing.

    The gun was broken down and transported on 25 freight cars, which did not include crew or supplies. Near where the gun was to be deployed, a spur line was laid from the main rail line. Three parallel tracks were then laid where the Schwerer Gustav was to be assembled. Two of the tracks supported the gun, and the third track allowed for parts and equipment to be brought in. A single rail was laid on both sides of the three parallel tracks. These widespread rails were for two gantry cranes to take parts from the third track and move them in position to assemble the Schwerer Gustav. Two parallel tracks extended from the assembly point to the firing position of the Schwerer Gustav. Dirt was piled up high on both sides of the double track to protect the gun from attack and allow it to be covered by camouflage netting. It took around 250 men 54 hours to assemble the Schwerer Gustav, and it took weeks for 2,000 to 4,500 men to lay the needed tracks and prepare the gun’s firing position. In addition, two Flak (Flugabwehrkanone or air defense cannon) battalions were needed to protect the gun from an aerial assault.

    Allied soldiers pose in front of a captured projectile (left) and an obturation case (right). The projectile had a ballistic nose cone made of aluminum.
    Krupp built special diesel-electric locomotives to move the Schwerer Gustav into firing position and to transport supplies. These locomotives were designated D 311, and two were paired together to act as a single unit, for a total of four engines to move the gun. Each locomotive was powered by a 940 hp (700 kW) six-cylinder MAN diesel engine. The engine ran a generator that provided power to traction motors mounted on the locomotive’s bogies. Ammunition was delivered via the twin rails behind the Schwerer Gustav. Hoists on the back of the gun would lift the ammunition to the firing deck. The shell was hoisted up one side of the gun, and the powder bags and a brass obturation case were hoisted up the other side. A hydraulic ram loaded the shell into the breach, followed by the powder bags and the case. Once loaded, the gun was raised into firing position. It took 20 to 45 minutes to load the gun and prepare it for firing. Only 14 to 16 shots could be fired each day.

    Two types of shells were fired from the Schwerer Gustav: armor piercing (AP) and high explosive (HE). The AP rounds were 11 ft 10 in (3.6 m) long and were fired with 4,630 lb (2,100 kg) of propellant. The AP round was made of chrome-nickel steel. It weighed 15,653 lb (7,100 kg) and carried 551 lb (250 kg) of explosives. The AP shell had a muzzle velocity of 2,362 fps (720 m/s) and a maximum range of 23.6 miles (38 km). At maximum range, the AP projectile reached an altitude of around 39,370 ft (12 km) and was in the air for two minutes. The HE ammunition was around 13 ft 9 in (4.2 m) long and was fired with 4,938 lb (2,240 kg) of propellant. The HE rounds weighed 10,582 lb (4,800 kg) and carried 1,543 lb (700 kg) of explosives. The HE shell had a muzzle velocity of 2,690 fps (820 m/s) and a maximum range of 29.2 miles (47 km). Upon impact, the HE projectile created a crater some 33 ft (10 m) wide and deep. The muzzle velocity for both the AP and HE shells was over twice the speed of sound, and both were fitted with an aluminum alloy ballistic nose cone. Spotter aircraft were used to direct the gun’s fire and assess the results.

    Construction of the Schwerer Gustav started in the spring of 1937, but forging the huge and complex barrel resulted in serious delays. By 1939, Alfried Krupp (von Bohlen und Halbach) began to take over company leadership from his father, whose health had begun to fail. In late 1939, testing started on sample components, and the gun’s AP projectile was able to successfully penetrate 23 ft (7 m) of concrete or 3 ft (1 m) of steel. It was obvious that the Schwerer Gustav would not be ready by the March 1940 deadline Hitler had requested.

    Shells and propellant for the gun were delivered by rail and hoisted up to the firing deck. The shell is on the far side, and the case with powder bags is in front of it (to the right). It took 20 to 45 minutes to reload the gun and prepare it for firing.
    In May 1940, Germany invaded Belgium and France. Since the Maginot Line ended at Belgium, rather than extending to the English Channel, Germany was able to simply go around the static fortifications and enter France. On 25 June 1940, France surrendered to Germany.

    With the fall of France, the Schwerer Gustav was no longer needed, but discussions ensued regarding other fortifications that the gun could be used against. Many in the Wehrmacht felt the gun was impractical and not worth the resources its construction consumed, let alone the manpower needed to deploy the gun. However, the Schwerer Gustav had become one of Hitler’s personal projects, so its development continued. Alfried Krupp hosted Hitler for a test firing during the gun’s acceptance trials in early 1941 at Rügenwalde, Germany (now Darłowo, Poland). Further tests and development continued through 1941. Some sources indicate that 250 rounds were fired from the gun during its testing.

    The gun was positioned on a shooting curve to allow for horizontal aiming. Rectangular braces were positioned on both sides of the inner rails to protect the tracks from the forces of firing the gun.
    On 8 January 1942, Schwere Artillerie-Abteilung (E) 672 (Heavy Artillery Division E 672) was established with 1,420 men and with Oberst (Colonel) Robert Böhm as its commander. The unit was formed to deploy the Schwerer Gustav. As the artillerymen worked on the gun, they called it “Dora,” and the nickname stuck. From that time on, the gun was typically referred to as Dora, rather than Schwerer Gustav. The different names led to some confusion regarding how many guns were built and when they were used. German sources typically indicate that Dora was a nickname from the artillerymen and that only one gun was ever deployed. However, many English sources state that Gustav and Dora were the first and second guns built and that the Dora gun was named in honor of Erich Müller’s wife.

    In February 1942, the division was sent to Bakhchisaray in the Crimean Peninsula, then part of the Soviet Union. The gun was to be used on the port city of Sevastopol, 18.6 miles (30 km) southwest of Bakhchisaray. Sevastopol had been under siege by German forces since November 1941. Five separate trains were used to transport the gun, the division, ammunition, supplies, and workshops to the deployment site. The Schwerer Gustav arrived in early March. In May, German troops and civilian workers laid a 1.2 mile (2 km) long access track to the firing site, followed by parallel tracks .75 miles (1.2 km) long for gun assembly and deployment. Once the track was ready, assembly of the gun commenced.

    On 5 June 1942, the Schwerer Gustav fired its first round at Sevastopol, and 13 additional shots followed that day. On 6 June, the Schwerer Gustav achieved the highpoint of its career. An ammunition magazine at White Cliff suffered a direct hit from the Schwerer Gustav. The magazine was buried 98 ft (30 m) under Severnaya Bay and had 33 ft (10 m) of concrete protection. The AP round passed though the water, ground, and concrete before detonating the magazine. At least one ship was also sunk after being damaged by blast waves from the impact of nearby shells.

    The Schwerer Gustav could fire a 15,653 lb (7,100 kg) AP shell 23.6 miles (38 km) or a 10,582 lb (4,800 kg) HE shell 29.2 miles (47 km). A spotter aircraft directed fire and assessed the results.
    The gun was used on three additional days before its ammunition was exhausted. The Schwerer Gustav fired a total of 48 shells at the city, and its barrel had become worn. Some sources claim that the barrel had a 300-round life and was the same one that had fired the 250 test rounds. Other sources state the barrel was new and should have been able to fire 100 shots before it became worn, but signs of wear were seen after as few as 15 shots. Regardless, the Schwerer Gustav’s barrel was replaced with a spare, and the original barrel was transported back to Germany for repairs. Of the 48 rounds fired, only 10 fell within 197 ft (60 m) of their target, with the most off-target shot landing 2,428 ft (740 m) from its intended point of impact. However, each huge shell caused massive damage all around its impact site.

    A few weeks after Sevastopol fell on 4 July 1942, Gustav Krupp gave the first Schwerer Gustav to Hitler as a personal gift and a sign of his support and allegiance to the Third Reich. The Krupp company would only accept payment for subsequent guns. The Schwerer Gustav was moved and redeployed for a planned offensive against Leningrad, which was also under siege. The gun had been assembled and placed in firing position, but its planned use was cancelled. The Schwerer Gustav was disassembled and taken back to Rügenwalde.

    The gun was overhauled, and an improved, lined barrel was fitted. A test firing on 19 March 1943 at Rügenwalde was attended by Hitler, Albert Speer, Alfried Krupp, and a number of other officials. Two shots were fired, with the second shell impacting 29.2 miles (47 km) away. The Schwerer Gustav was then disassembled and placed in storage near Chemnitz, Germany in September 1943. The gun remained there until 14 April 1945, when it was destroyed by German troops one day before US soldiers captured the area. Parts of the Schwerer Gustav were recovered by the Soviets and supposedly transported to Russia. The second Schwerer Gustav was reportedly completed but never deployed. In March 1945, it was moved from Rügenwalde to Grafenwöhr, Germany, where it was destroyed on 19 April 1945.

    While it was a powerful weapon, the Schwerer Gustav required a tremendous amount of resources for its construct and deployment. Its size and complexity severely limited where and when the gun could be deployed and also made it very susceptible to aerial attack.
    Around November 1943, plans were initiated to use a cannon to shell Britain from across the English Channel. It was decided that the third Krupp 80 cm Kanone (E) would be built as the gun for this purpose. In order to send a shell 99 to 124 miles (160 to 200 km), a projectile 20.5 in (52 cm) in diameter and weighing 1,499 lb (680 kg) would be shot out of a barrel 157 ft (48 m) long. This gun was named Länger Gustav (Longer Gustav). The gun was damaged during a bombing raid while it was still under construction. Some components for the Länger Gustav were discovered at the Krupp factory in Essen by Allied troops in 1945.

    In December 1942, Krupp proposed a self-propelled 80 cm Kanone (E) known as the Landkreuzer P. 1500 Monster. The P. 1500 used the same 31.5 in (80 cm) main gun as the Schwerer Gustav, but it also had two 5.9 in (15 cm) sFH 18.1 L/30 field guns and a number of 15 mm MG151/15 cannons. Powering the P. 1500 were four 2,170 hp (1,618 kW) nine-cylinder MAN M9V 40/46 diesel engines. The P. 1500 was 137 ft 10 in (42 m) long, 59 ft 1 in (18 m) wide, and 23 ft (7 m) tall. True to its name, the Monster weighed 3,306,930 lb (1,500,000 kg). Requiring a crew of over 100, the machine had an estimated top speed of 9.3 mph (15 km/h) and a range of 31 miles (50 km). The P. 1500 project was cancelled in 1943 by Albert Speer, the Minister for Armaments, before any serious work had been done.

    After the war, Alfried Krupp and Erich Müller, the gun’s designer, were sentenced to 12 years in prison for crimes against humanity by participating in the plundering, devastation, and exploitation of occupied countries and by participating in the murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, and use for slave labor of German nationals, prisoners of war, and civilians who came under German control. Krupp was pardoned after three years, and Müller was released after four years.

    The first Schwerer Gustav gun was destroyed by German troops on 14 April 1945 to prevent its capture by US forces. Some sources state that the gun was recovered by the Soviets. A US soldier poses in front of the gun’s cradle. The girders attached to the cradle were used for transporting and mounting the cradle to the rest of the gun. The circular pad behind the soldier is a trunnion mount.
    While the Schwerer Gustav was mechanically a well-engineered weapon, its requirements for use made it very impractical and nearly useless. The Maginot Line was easily bypassed, rather than penetrated, calling into question why the Schwerer Gustav was needed in the first place. However, Hitler liked the gun and called it his “steel fist.” It was the type of grandiose weapon that Hitler felt displayed the technological superiority of the Third Reich.

    No large pieces of the Schwerer Gustav guns remain. However, a number of inert projectiles and cases are preserved in various museums. After the war, the D 331 locomotives were redesignated V 188 and used to haul freight for the West German Railway (Deutsche Bundesbahn).

    Germans destroyed part of the second Schwerer Gustav on 19 April 1945 to prevent its capture. A US soldier gives scale to the gun’s barrel. The second gun’s cradle, which was blown up, can be seen on the left.
    Sources:

    http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/80-cm-Kanone_(E)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwerer_Gustav
    http://ww2db.com/weapon.php?q=89
    http://samilitaryhistory.org/vol124lw.html
    http://html2.free.fr/canons/dora.htm
    http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wehrmachtslokomotive_D_311
    http://www.modellbahn.com/37283.V188.html
    http://www.e94114.de/V188.htm
    http://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.asp?armor_id=480
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landkreuzer_P._1500_Monster

  • Gravel Ballast 1939

    Official Directive from 1939

    Railway Gravel Bed

    § 20. Bet fabrics
    In tracks and soft 1. Order, only track gravel grain I (35 to 70 mm diameter) can be used. In heavily burdened tracks and soft 2. Order, a grain I can only be installed with particularly approved exceptions. In the other tracks and soft 2. Order and in soft 3. Order, Track Gravel Grain II (20 to 35 mm diameter) is to be used. At its place, 2. Order Gravel (7 to 50 mm diameter) can be used in train station tracks, but not in tracks on iron sleepers. For Tracks 3. Order, the need is usually to be covered by old bet fabrics; otherwise, track gravel is to be used.

  • Barrenger Soldiers of the 6th Volksgrenadier Division

    [ngg src=”galleries” ids=”1″ display=”basic_thumbnail”]

    Barrenger Soldiers
    6th Volksgrenadier Division

    Photos 1 TO 4: Barrenger soldiers of the 6th Volksgrenadier Division Marching through the recaptured Lauban on March 30., 1945 In the last few days, six ten-Year-olds have been used to “armed” in the so-called Volksgrenadier divisions. Already after two to three weeks of training, these boys were sent to the front.

    On March 3., 1945, the panzergruppe nehring started a counterattack with two tanks (*) on the soviets in silesia, in which they managed to regain the city of lauban, which was occupied by the Soviets, and a Soviet Guard-Shooter – Corps almost completely adversarial.
    A witness describes his impressions after the conquest of Lau: ” on the way through the debris of the city, we saw terrible images of destroyed vehicles of all kinds, from panje wagons with dead horses and many dead Russian soldiers. On the occasion we also saw the American trucks delivered to the Russians by the USA, these were the “Studebakers” against which our still existing trucks were really pathetic. (…) if there is an increase in the terms of horror and grey, then I experienced this increase when I went to a house with two other countries. What we saw in the basement of the house was atrocious, and we got a terrible shock. In the basement were the bodies of five naked German women, who had been slashed from the sheath of the abdomen. I’m sure bayonets were used for that. At this sight we were not only fulfilled by a grey, but also from a terrible anger to those who had committed so mean, so-called murders. We were in a constitution where we would have killed Russians, if they would have stood in front of us as prisoners right now, without regard to whether they would have been the perpetrators or not. I think I might have been ready to kill another human being. Then I couldn’t have been more proud of not having a human being on conscience. What we saw there was a crime that was untitled to us, which put us in a rage of anger. For the first time, I experienced how fast it can happen to become completely unpredictable. Our anger did not stand against an ideology that addressed the brutes who had done so.”
    (Source: Lemo Museum Online / witnesses report by Werner M. From Kronach)

    (*) Daily report of the German wehrmacht leadership of 03.03.1945: ” group nehring joined two panzerkorps… in the room on both sides to attack… and came well forward against the first surprised enemy with both attack groups. While the right attack group is scheduled… on naumburg (! ) Eindreht, stands the left attack group in the fight with the… Self-reinforcing enemy.”
    Day report of the German Wehrmacht tour of 04.03.1945: ” in lower silesia, the own attack of two panzerkorps in the room lauban did not bring the expected success and was first fixed. From the further course… it will depend on whether the enemy is prompted to use parts of the probably to refresh extracted 3. Tank Army, which is expected to have an essential disturbance of the enemy intentions regarding the timing of his planning.”
    Day report of the German Wehrmacht tour of 05.03.1945: ” in lower silesia, the own attack after regrouping won several kilometers of ground.”
    Day report of the German wehrmacht guided tour of 06.03.1945: ” in silesia, the own area reached its own attack… the queis section 6 KM N-O Lauban, while the eastern attack group was only insignificant forward by flank attacks of the enemy Came.”
    Day report of the German wehrmacht guided tour of 07.03.1945: ” in silesia, the own attack in the area of lauban was essentially (! ) the goals set. Strong military forces have been dismissed and an enemy forces group included.”

  • Bromskirchen

    The tiny town of Bromskirchen, located northeast of Westerwald, was captured by Combat Command B of the American Third Armored Division on March 29, 1945. A train was coming into Bromskirchen and at the head of the line was an oil-fired locomotive, and further back was a coal-fired locomotive. After moving a few miles the train came to a stop near Bromskirchen because the coal-powered locomotive ran out of water. The operators did not want to be stuck there in the open. Quickly they disconnected the train in the middle, and the first half of the train continued under the power of the oil locomotive toward Winterberg. For some reason, this portion of the train only made it to the tunnel at the Brilon Forest. When it was discovered by the Americans later that day, they found seven railway cars, each containing 12 V-2 warheads, one car containing boxes of carbon-graphite V-2 rudders, fuses, batteries, and cans of calcium permanganate.

    The remaining section of the train, with the steam locomotive, waited about 20 minutes at Bromskirchen to fill up with water. Suddenly an American tank appeared on the road and opened fire on the train with its machine guns. The locomotive received a direct hit, damaging the main steam pipes and leaving a large hole in the side of the locomotive. The railway workers jumped from the train and escaped. The Americans found ten railway cars containing nine damaged and partially burned V-2s, plus the scattered parts of another V-2 and some warheads. Elements of the Third Armored Division also captured a factory nearby located at Hatzfeld, which contained several intact V-2 rockets.

    In early April 1945 members of the western press got their first chance to see the infamous German V-weapon up close. The discovery was in the limelight for several days. Even Supreme Allied Commander General Eisenhower travelled to the zone to scrutinize the curious find, as English and American newsreels reported his inspection in detail.

  • FuMB-26 TUNIS

    FuMB 26 TUNIS 4 1FuMB-26 Tunis
    A further advanced radar warning device, the Tunis covered the 3cm band which was used by US radar. The antenna was horn-shaped, and as with the Fliege, it covered a wide horizontal arc and a narrow vertical area. To save bridge space, Fliege and the Tunis’s antenna were mounted back-to-back on a single pole. The watch crew still had to periodically rotate the antenna and it had to be taken below deck every time the boat submerged. Tunis entered service in May 1944.

    FuMB 26 TUNIS 3 1

    FuMB 26 TUNIS 1 1

    FuMB 26 TUNIS 5 1

    FuMB 26 TUNIS 6 1

    FuMB 26 TUNIS 7 1

    FuMB 26 TUNIS 2 1 1

  • Polish Armoured Armoured Train №11 1916

    Polish Armoured Armoured Train №11 1916

    InSCALE Polish Armoured Train No11 1916 2

    Archiduke Charles, as commander of the c.k.armády performed regular military inspections. On August 24, 1916, he was in Galicia to inspect combat positions and personally inspected and armoured train No. II. Here he walks past the armoured train set. Then he stopped at an armoured steam locomotive of the 377 MAV series and “spoke” a few words with the military engineer and the heater.

    InSCALE Polish Armoured Train No11 1916 1

    Archiduke Charles, as commander of the c.k.armády performed regular military inspections. On August 24, 1916 he was in Galicia to inspect combat positions and personally inspected and armoured train No. II. Here he walks past the armored train set, a visible overtaking car marked MÁV Jhh 175758 on the right.

  • How To Paint Wooden Crates

    Quick Tip. Making wooden crates, by Sergiusz Pęczek

    1) The resin PaK 40 AMMO crates are first primed with a AMMO grey primer using an airbrush, and then hand painted using A.MIG-036 Old Wood acrylic color.

    2) When the base color is dry to the touch, we slightly modify the color by applying a very thin acrylic filter, made of A.MIG-037 New Wood diluted with water.

    3) For further steps we need to prepare some acrylic mixes for washes and filters for tinting. From left to right: A.MIG-043 Shadow Rust, A.MIG-046 Matt Black, A.MIG-048 Yellow, and A.MIG-040 Medium Rust. For thinning I used tap water and Transparator medium – A.MIG-2017

    4) At first I applied highly diluted dark brown wash to enhance the wood grain, and make initial false shadows around the details.

    5) Then by adding the black color to the previous color, I began to gradually darken the deepest cavities. For the last step, I used a clean black wash made of acrylic paint.

    6) Here we can see the effect of tinting the wood color with yellow and rust tone acrylic filters. When using acrylics, you can work much faster than with enamels, but this technique requires some practice – it’s not as easy to correct the mistakes due to the fast dry time.

    7) In the last step I highlighted the high points with A.MIG-036 Old Wood.

    8) The final touch was to paint the clasps with mat black, and then rub some A.MIG-3009 Gun Metal pigment with Tamiya Craft Cotton Swab, creating a realistic appearance and excellent contrast between wood and metal elements.

  • Soviet Colors in the Great Patriotic War

    Soviet Colors in the Great Patriotic War

    The colors used by the RKKA to paint its armored vehicles during the Great Patriotic War have been the subject of much conjecture over the years.  While I do not claim to be an expert in this subject, I have come across some useful books and articles, both in print and on-line, which I will attempt to summarize here.  Where possible, colors are stated along with their approximate equivalents in the U.S. Federal Standard 595 color scheme.  If your computer has a 32-bit color graphics adapter, you can view FS 595 colors at www.colorserver.net.

    Basic Color

    Prior to 1938, all RKKA vehicles, both armored and soft-skin, were painted in a dark olive green color designated Green 3B.  In 1938, this color was changed to a nearly identical green known as Protective Green 4BO, which persisted as the basic color until the end of the war.

    There has been much debate about the exact nature of Protective Green 4BO, and the subject has inspired much heated argument.  These arguments have been exacerbated by variations in the color due to inexact mixing at the various factories, and due to fading in the field under the effects of temperature and the elements.  Color degradation in surviving color photographs has not helped the situation, nor has the fact that many of the vehicles photographed during Operation Barbarossa in 1941 were extremely dusty, which altered their apparent color.

    RKKA paint mixing instructions from 1941 specify that Protective Green 4BO was a mixture of 40-60% yellow ochre, 15-20% zinc chromate, 10% ultramarine and 10-20% white.  If these instructions are followed using modern equivalents, the result is a range of fairly light greens with a distinct yellow tint, close to FS34257 and quite similar to the color seen on the preserved vehicles at the CAF Museum in Moscow, even though those vehicles are painted using a post-war paint commonly known as ‘Warsaw Pact Green’.  The similarity to FS34257 is supported by a number of surviving color photographs, after accepted industry-standard color correction techniques are applied.

    Some sources have stated that the chemical composition of the paint was not entirely stable and tended to darken over time when exposed to the elements.  Other sources refute this claim and instead maintain that the paint was subject to normal fading; ie. that it faded to a lighter shade over time.  The color mixture given above, and its FS 595 equivalent, is therefore applicable only to newly painted vehicles and even then, only to those painted with ‘fresh’ paint stocks.

    Kolomiyets and Moschanskiy (see below) cite official Soviet records, examined in the 1990s, as containing a somewhat darker and color with more blue, which approximates closely to FS34102.  It must be remembered that the ‘official’ paint chips were no doubt stored in an office environment, in darkness under relatively constant conditions of temperature and humidity, which would likely have slowed though not completely halted any chemical action.

    When the U.S. Army evaluated both a T-34 and a KV-1 at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in November 1942, the colors were noted as FS24052, which is darker still.  The KV was manufactured at ChKZ in April 1942, and the paint was therefore approximately seven months old when it arrived at the Aberdeen Proving Ground.  Chemical darkening due to the age of the paint and its likely exposure to the elements during its journey from Chelyabinsk to the U.S. would account for the darker color.

    Given these facts, it is reasonable to assume that Soviet vehicles appeared in a variety of olive green shades.  These ranged from FS34257 for newly manufactured vehicles through FS34096 and FS34095 to FS24052 for older vehicles.  The shade depended not only on the age of the paint but also on the conditions of sunlight and temperature to which it had been subjected.

    In 1953, the base color for Soviet armored vehicles changed again, to the nitropentanapthalene-based NPF-10 paint, which produced a brownish green tone.

     

    Camouflage Colors

    In the fall of 1939, the RKKA adopted a system of camouflage colors to be applied over the Protective Green 4BO base coat.  Up to two additional colors could be used:

    • Dark Brown 6K, sometimes denoted as 6RP, was a dark earth brown similar to FS30117.
    • Yellow Earth 7K was a light sand color close to FS23578.

    Both paints were supplied in form of thick paste that was diluted with gasoline, kerosene or a special drying oil.  Differences in the dilution medium and/or the mixing proportions caused significant variations in the final colors.

    One or both camouflage colors in various patterns were used, depending upon the particular region within the Soviet Union.  The table on page 436 of KV – Technical History and Variants gives the breakdown of the different camouflage colors, based upon the various Military Districts.

    For winter operations in areas where snow was typical, all vehicles were to be painted in overall white.

    This system of camouflage was in effect when German forces invaded the Soviet Union on June 22nd 1941.  However, photographs suggest that few units had actually implemented the schemes, and most vehicles appeared in overall Protective Green 4BO in the summer and fall of 1941.  By the early winter, units had begun to apply camouflage to their vehicles but due to the chaotic conditions that prevailed in the latter months of 1941, the officially prescribed schemes were often ignored and numerous improvised schemes appeared.

    The RKKA therefore instituted new regulations in the early winter of 1941/42.  The regional schemes were abandoned in favor of terrain-specific guidelines, again using Dark Brown 6K and Yellow Earth 7K over Protective Green 4BO.  Dark Brown 6K was to be used to cover 15-30% of a vehicle’s surface, in large patches to simulate the effect of tree trunks in wooded terrain.  Yellow Earth 6K was to be used to cover 15-30% of the surface in areas of ploughed fields or dry earth.

    For winter camouflage, a special water-based paint designated Flat White B was issued, to be applied over the existing camouflage.  The practice of painting the entire vehicle white was discouraged.  Instead, green areas were to be covered completely and dark brown or yellow earth areas were to be covered with a criss-cross pattern of white stripes, applied by hand.  In practice however, these guidelines were rarely followed exactly, and vehicles appeared with large patches of white applied irregularly over the other colors, and sometimes in overall white.

    Camouflage colors were applied by the individual vehicle crews using brushes, so there was little uniformity between vehicles, even within the same unit.  Some crews feathered the edges between the different colors using brushes dampened with gasoline or kerosene, while others left ‘hard’ edges between the colors.

    Photographs indicate that most vehicles continued to appear in overall Protective Green 4BO through 1942 and 1943, with varying levels of white applied during the winter months.  In the spring and summer of 1944 however, camouflage colors became more common, though many vehicles still appeared in overall green until the end of the war.

    Further Reading

    The section Color Schemes on page 434 of KV – Technical History and Variants provides considerably more detail, as it applies to the KV series heavy tanks.

    The best book dealing specifically with the subject is Camouflage of the Tanks of the Red Army 1930-1945 by Maxim Kolomiyets and Il’ya Moschanskiy, translated by Stephen Sewell, published by Armada Vertical 1999.  Unfortunately this book is out of print, though it can be found occasionally on eBay or Amazon.

    There is a useful article on Soviet colors and camouflage on the Matador Models site in the UK.

  • Unintended Consequences

    Soviet Armour and Soft Skinned Vehicle colour is a controversial topic at the best of times with polarized proponents arguing “any green will do”, “it’s close enough”, “crews used whatever is available” to those wanting to have “accurate colour reproduction” for authenticity.

    Actually, there is a thread of truth woven throughout the tapestry of such viewpoints, however, there were standardized colours in place from 1935.

    The vast majority of Soviet vehicles of all types had a very short life expectancy with entire monthly tank productions at times being lost before the paint had the opportunity to fully cure. Colour variations for surviving vehicles were affected by the number of factors such as the number of paint coats, sun fading, dust and the lightening effect of chalk and particularly limestone in the winter-white top coat chemically reacting with the pigment bleaching the paint. When spring rains arrived there was a paler shade of green. Due to their high linseed content, the paints behaved more like oil paint then harder, more durable enamel or automotive type finishes found on German or Allied equipment. The Germans took it one step further using a zinc ‘galvanizing coating’ prior to priming.

    When looking at black and white photographs from the period one would conclude they were all one colour, which to a degree is accurate, however, Soviet vehicles were painted in a ‘basic’ green with camouflage colours. Depending on the clarity of the era image, camouflage patterns can be seen to the discerning eye, often dust and debris obscure the colour differentiation masking the detection difficult.

    We have a tendency to draw from our own experiences what the colours are as referenced in artistic representations and museum pieces. Driving through the countryside throughout the seasons we observe the colour of soils, dry and wet. Dirt is dirt… right?… wrong‽

    Is it the same colour everywhere say for the red soil of Vietnam? One would think so but it is not the case for parts of Europe having different regionalized soil colours. One particular soil type turned out to be a logistical nightmare for the Germans…”black-earth”.

    Black-earth or dark-earth is rich in organic matter hence the blackish colour. When wet it behaves like a sponge retaining rain and snowmelt turning roads and fields into a quagmire for vehicles. The Russians call it “Chernozem” where “Chern(y)” means black and “Zemija” earth.

    Mud at the best of times makes travel difficult due to its slick nature, however “black-earth” containing a high percentage of humus 4% – 16%, capable of a high moisture storage capability, compounded the slick problem. There is mud and then there is mud, we are discussing the latter.

    Depending on the area of conflict in Europe and the steppes of Russia black-earth is commonplace. Chernozem can also be found in the prairies of Canada.

    Wet Chernozem is almost black when dry it shows numerous shades of grey and brown.

    What does soil colour have to do with anything you ask? Soil colours are part of Soviet camouflage colours.

    The Russians used 10 Colour Schemas from 1927 to 1945.
    1) Protective Green 1927–37 (light olive drab)
    2) 3B AU (dark olive green)
    3) Protective Green (brighter olive green to light olive green)
    4) 4BO (light olive green with more yellow )
    5) 6K (dark earth brown)
    6) 7K (light sand)
    7) Z–2 ()
    8) IZ–3 (lighter green to brownish-green)
    9) 6RP (black-brown to a NATO BLACK colour)
    10) White Winter Washable Camouflage Paint (ground natural chalk or limestone similar to white-wash)

    What’s all the fuss about colours? The Red Army used non-standard paint to prime and paint all vehicles including wooden portions. Starting in 1935 the standard Red Army vehicle colour was 3B AU, a colour resembling a dark Olive Drab. Standards and regulations is created for uniformity and application of colours.

    The idea of dark green is to blend in with the surrounding foliage and vegetation. Colours like 6K, 7K or blackish 6RP were to blend in with exposed soil and shadows to break up the vehicle profile.

    Unexpected consequences came not only in the form of black-earth but also with the use of 3B AU.

    The Germans discovered by using filters on their sighting optics the light wave signature from plant chlorophyll and 3B AU differed, thus highlighting the vehicle concealed in the woods or among shrubs, bushes and other undergrowth.

    Not readily visible through binoculars or the naked eye, the sighting optics were able to detect concealed vehicles resulting in major losses for the Soviet Red Army. Thus 4BO came to be used as a standardized colour for military vehicles.

    Remember the Predator science fiction movies where the alien could see it’s human prey body heat signatures? The same idea here, the difference being how the light reflection differed between plants and vehicles, not thermal energy detection.

    3B AU is an acronym of Alkidono Uretanovaya (Alkyd –urethane protective base). This paint was composed of the following components in weight 100 parts of linseed oil, 72.5 of lead white, 47.5 of zinc oxide, 33 of yellow ochre pigment, 7 of burnt amber pigment, 4.75 of elutriated graphite and 2.4 of ultramarine blue.

    The mixture of pigments used in the paint reflected a different light spectrum than the chlorophyll which gives the green colour to vegetation. The problem caused the Soviet Army to abandon the use of 3B AU in favour of 4BO.

  • UNEXPECTED CONSEQUENCES 3B AU

    Soviet Armour and Soft Skinned Vehicle Colour is a controversial topic at the best of times with polarized proponents arguing ‘any green will do’, ‘it’s close enough’, ‘crews used what is available’ to those wanting to have “accurate colour reproduction” to be as close as possible to authenticity.

    Looking at black and white photographs from the period one would conclude they were all one colour, which to a degree is accurate, however, Soviet vehicles were painted in a basic green with camouflage colours. Depending on how good the era image is camouflage patterns can be seen to the searching eye.

    We have a tendency to draw from our own experiences what the colours are as referenced in artistic representations and museum pieces. Driving through the countryside throughout the seasons we observe the colour of soils, dry and wet. Dirt is dirt… right? Is it the same colour everywhere say for the red soil of Vietnam? One would think so but it is not the case for parts of Europe have different regionalized soil colours. One particular soil type turned out to be a logistical nightmare for the Germans…”black earth”.

    Black earth or dark earth is rich in organic matter hence the blackish colour. When wet it behaved like a sponge retaining rain and snowmelt turning roads and fields into a quagmire for vehicles. The Russians call it “Chernozem” where “Chern(y)” means black and “Zemija” earth.

    What does soil colour have to do with anything you ask? Soil colours are part of Soviet camouflage colours.

    The Russians used 8 Colour Schemas from 1927 to 1945.
    1) Protective Green 1927–37 (light olive drab)
    2) 3B AU (black-green to light black-green)
    3) Protective Green (brighter olive green to light olive green)
    4) 4BO (olive drab)
    5) 6K & 7K (reddish brown to yellow ochre )
    6) Z–2 & IZ–3 (lighter green to brownish-green)
    7) 6RP (black-brown to a NATO BLACK colour)
    8) White Washable Paint (ground natural chalk or limestone)

    What’s all the fuss about colours? The Red Army used non-standard paint to prime and paint all vehicles including wooden portions. Starting in 1935 the standard Red Army vehicle colour was 3B AU, a colour resembling Olive Drab. Standards and regulations were created for uniformity and application of colours.

    The idea for a dark green is to blend in with the surrounding foliage and vegetation. Colours like 6K, 7K or blackish 6RP were to blend in with exposed soil and shadows to break up the vehicle profile.

    Unexpected consequences came with the use of 3B AU. The Germans discovered by using filters on their sighting optics the light wave signature from plant chlorophyll and 3B AU differed, highlighting the vehicle concealed in the woods or among shrubs, bushes and other undergrowth not readily visible through binoculars or the naked eye.

    Remember the Predator science fiction movies where the alien could see it’s human prey body heat signatures, the same idea, the difference being how the light reflection differed between pants and vehicles.

    3B AU is an acronym of Alkidono Uretanovaya (Alkyd –urethane protective base). This paint was composed of the following components in weight 100 parts of linseed oil, 72.5 of lead white, 47.5 of zinc oxide, 33 of yellow ochre pigment, 7 of burnt amber pigment, 4.75 of elutriated graphite and 2.4 of ultramarine blue.

    The mixture of pigments used in the paint reflected a different light spectrum than the chlorophyll which gives colour to the vegetation. The problem caused the Soviet Army to abandon the use of 3B AU in favour of 4BO.

Welcome to our all-new site! We’re fleshing it out for the best scale modelling experience.
KSM Club monthly meeting every 3rd Thursday. Time 18:00 - 21:00.  📧
Inclement Weather Cancellation
Club Meeting scheduled for today, Dec 15, 2022 is cancelled due to adverse weather and travelling conditions.